Looking at these two mics side by side, there is a clear difference. Overall: Blue Yeti Which One Are YOU Leaning Towards? To summarize our findings in this Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nano comparison, here are the winners for each category: Side by side, the full-size Yeti feel and sounds a bit more professional.You miss out on the bi-directional and stereo polar patterns. You still get the 2 main polar patterns.Plug-and-play USB class-compliant device.Pros & Cons: Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nano Blue Yeti Pros & Cons Pros: It’s super compact, weighing less than half of what the full-size unit weighs, so it’ll fit nicely in your backpack or carry-on luggage.Ĭheck Latest Price 9. Size & weight: Bottom LineĪssuming your goal when assessing the size and weight of a mic is to get the smallest, lightest microphone possible, then the Blue Yeti Nano is the winner in this department. This is mostly due to a smaller stand and shorter mic body. In terms of dimensions, it’s a little smaller in width and depth but a good third shorter in height, which is where the size really differs in the Nano. The total weight of the Nano, including its standard, is a minimal 1.39 lbs. The Yeti Nano is, perhaps to little surprise, a whole lot smaller and a whole lot lighter. The mic itself is about the same weight as a U87, so there’s not much to complain or write home about here. It has a total weight of 3.4 lbs, or 1.2 lbs without the stand (it’s removable and clearly quite heavy). The Blue Yeti is pretty standard in the size and weight department. Size & weight: Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti NanoĬheck Latest Price Size & weight: Blue Yeti It sounds more natural, more present, and gives you a more malleable sound palette that gives you a bit more room to develop your own vocal chain in the mix. Despite this, and the extra bit depth afforded by the Nano, the standard Yeti mic still comes out on top. Overall, the Nano has a more crafted frequency response that is a bit more ‘ready to go’ straight out of the box. So, a little more bass response than the full-size Yeti, but not a whole lot. It doesn’t roll off in the low-end til around 200Hz, where it drops quite quickly. It doesn’t have the sharp presence boost, just a few dips at 500Hz (removing boxiness), 2kHz (removing nasality), and 8kHz (targeting sibilance). The frequency response of the Nano is a bit different, too. This extra depth allows for a greater dynamic range in recordings, so if you’re singing a very dynamic piece, then the Nano is likely to serve you better. The Blue Yeti Nano does win in one area, as it records at 24-bit. The Yeti samples at 48kHz and records at 16-bit, which is fairly decent, however… Sound quality: Blue Yeti Nano That means it doesn’t have a whole lot of boomy low-end: great for voice recordings, not so great for recording instruments like bass guitar or piano. This gives voice recordings a tonne of clarity, and can actually make them sound a little nasal, depending on your vocalist.Ī subtle dip just below this (around 2kHz) seeks to combat this, and then it’s a soft roll down to 300Hz, where the Yeti falls off very quickly. The Yeti is a fairly forward-sounding microphone, thanks to a reasonably sharp boost in the upper mids, peaking at 4kHz. Sure, it might not be as glorious as the Neumann U87, or as strong at rejecting background noise as Shure’s SM7B, but it’s a fraction of the price of these mics, and it connects via USB. The Blue Yeti has pretty much become the standard quality of USB mics. Let’s start by looking at the factor that really matters when choosing a new mic: the sound quality. Sound quality: Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nano The Blue Yeti Nano weighs about half of what the full-size Yeti does, and it’s quite a bit smaller, so it’s definitely more portable, even if you sacrifice a couple of polar patterns.Ĭheck Latest Price 1. Go for Blue Yeti Nano if you’re a traveling podcaster, YouTuber, musician, or sound engineer.By nearly all measures, this is the better microphone. Go for Blue Yeti if you need 4 polar patterns, a dedicated gain control, and excellent sound quality, and you don’t mind the extra weight and size.So when it comes down to Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nano, which one should you choose? Here’s a quick overview: Pros & Cons: Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nanoģ0-Second Summary: Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nano Price & Value For Money: Blue Yeti Nano.Price & Value For Money: Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nano Color choice: Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nano Build quality: Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nano Connectivity: Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nano Polar patterns: Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nano Size & weight: Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nano 30-Second Summary: Blue Yeti vs Blue Yeti Nano.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |